By Josh Hill October 2, 2014

A Marketing Attribution Model that Works for Marketing Automation

The past few months we have been working with the team at PerfectoMobile to help take advantage of everything Marketo has to offer. One key project goal was to conduct multi-touch attribution without Marketo’s Revenue Cycle Explorer. The team at Perfecto wanted to know why leads responded to an offer and where they came in from to be able to measure marketing offer and channel effectiveness. A few of the key questions posed included: That’s a big challenge and we gave it a lot of thought on white boards real and virtual. As I worked on this, I thought about a conversation I had with Jonathan Beaton about Lead Sources. He pointed out that most firms have a list similar to these: Lead Sources - Bad But a lead does not appear from a Webinar or White Paper. The content is why they are there, not how. So the standard list of Lead Sources confuses content with channel. As Jonathan noted,
“Why is ‘Web’ not a lead source? Web is not a lead source because visitors to your website may be there for a variety of reasons.”
Similarly, a whitepaper is not a “source” of a lead. As I pondered this question for a great solution, I went into my friend Jeff Coveney’s presentation on Lead Sources at the 2014 Marketo Summit. I found his idea that you could track the Source and the Asset detail one part of the puzzle, especially for naming Sources and for First Touch, Last Touch tracking. I wanted to develop this system further, so I kept working at it. One way to look at this situation is to ask, “What is the origin of the Lead and where were they going?” I like to think of this as the Origin and the End Point. Channel Origin to End Point System If we take a look at this image, we can see that a Channel Origin can go to more than one End Point. I might promote my event on a PPC platform while also using my in-house list and an outbound call campaign. Longer term and large marketing programs might use five or ten promotion platforms to get the word out. And it is a good idea to remember that your promotion channels are promotion platforms, just as if you were standing up in the town square and had a loudspeaker. There are several platforms in that square and each one has a different audience. Thus, Google AdWords has one, very large group, while your trade association has a smaller, focused platform.

Large AudienceSet of all Google Users. Only a few at a time are looking for exactly what you offer.

Marketing Show AudienceThe Audience of B2B Ad Buyers in Tech Space

From a systems perspective, your Channels and database might look like this. As you can see, promotion platforms drive traffic to a website (or landing page) and then into Marketo. Lead Sources to Marketo With this understanding, I began working out the best methods to understand the data we could collect that would explain how well marketing was doing. When we came to PerfectoMobile, we needed to look at how to separate Lead Source data from Content request data in Marketo and Salesforce. Thus, we created a new attribution concept: Offer and Channel.

The Offer and Channel Attribution Method

The Offer is the content–the reason the lead entered your database. The Channel is how your lead got to your site in the first place. One way to think about it is that Offers are content, while Channels are equivalent to Lead Sources or “platforms” used to promote the Offer. You always promote an Offer on a Channel, not the other way around. With that in mind, we developed several iterations of the actual system to collect data. As we met to finalize the details, Linda Duchin, Demand Generation Director, said,
“When designing tracking models, I try to picture myself as the lead recipient and supply them with the most valuable information for follow up: Why did the lead respond, and how did they find out about us.”
Immediately I saw the simplicity she crystallized for all marketers who need closed loop attribution. This goes right back to elementary school essay lessons: the 5Ws and the 1H: Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How. Let’s take a closer look at how this concept works. Most marketing automation platforms (MAPs) take care of the Who and When because those are baseline features. Tracking things like the What, Why, Where, and How are a bit trickier. Usually those items have to be tracked and setup by the user (meaning you) with Forms, hidden fields, and URL parameters. A system like Marketo will let you track the Offer and the Channel via the Program concept. Yet, in Marketo you can only choose Channel or Offer with the Program Channel Type. For Perfecto, we chose to track Offer at the Program level.
The Five W and 1H Marketing Attribution Model

The Five W and 1H Marketing Attribution Model

In your MAP, the flow could look like this, with URL parameters driving data collection in your MAP. We will talk about how that is done in more detail next time. Channel Offer Marketing Attribution System Once you understand these concepts, the hard part is putting together a system that lets you track each of these touches and report on them. Marketo already handles the Who and the When. The individual touch data will be used to answer the questions Perfecto posed at the outset:
Question How We Answer It
Did that newsletter sponsorship generate better webinar attendance than our benchmark?
  • Offer: Webinar
  • Channel: Newsletter Ad
  • Who: Lead Info
  • What: Webinar Y
  • When: Date
  • Where: Magazine X
  • Why: Webinar
  • How: Newsletter Ad
How much did that cost? Program Cost DataSFDC Cost Data
Did a particular tactic lead to revenue and did that get associated to the content? Use a campaign or RCE cross tab to show Offer X used Channel Y to obtain 58 leads and 4 opportunities with $120,000 in pipeline
The next step is to develop the system for First, Last, and Multi-touch attribution to record the entire history of interactions and then be able to report on that history in a way that meaningful decisions can be made. In upcoming posts, we will discuss just how to do this using Marketo and SFDC with, and without, Revenue Cycle Explorer. Image Credits: toprankblog, seattlemunicipalarchives

Josh Hill

About Perkuto:
For marketing leaders wrestling with revenue growth and proving impact of marketing, Perkuto provides services that map revenue goals to marketing strategy and executes on initiatives that increase marketing and sales team productivity. As a Marketo Platinum Partner, we excel at implementing and integrating MarTech systems into your processes with a high level of expertise and a deep bench of certified consultants.

10 Responses to “A Marketing Attribution Model that Works for Marketing Automation”

  1. […] is a lot to debate in this advanced model so make sure to check Josh Hill’s recent article that covers some of those those […]

  2. Anurag Kamat says:

    Really enjoyed this post. I keep referring back to it. Thank you for sharing!

  3. Nichole says:

    We’ve been struggling with this concept and orchestrating in Marketo for 2 years. I look forward to reading the future posts.

  4. […] is a lot to debate in this advanced model so make sure to check Josh Hill’s recent article that covers some of those those […]

  5. […] highly recommend the Offer-Channel Attribution Method, which provides a framework for the type of data to collect from each […]

  6. […] system that takes into account touches, offers, and sources. This post is a follow up to the Offer Channel Method, showing you a blueprint for building one version of this […]

  7. […] is a lot to debate in this advanced model so make sure to check Josh Hill’s recent article that covers some of those those […]

  8. […] stack requires new objects. While I’ve written a bit about the Touch object in the past with Channel-Offer Attribution, there are 4 objects that are often missing from the MOPS toolkit, especially at the SMB […]

  9. Martin Brendan says:

    Great blog. It’s a very informative topic. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

B2B Marketing Zone